Read the actual letter Spoonermore wrote rather than everyone else's take on it. I'm getting a bit fed up with everyone rolling their eyes instead of doing their own critical thinking here. If you read the letter, it explains exactly how it could have been done. It's linked in this piece.

Musk has control over and access to Starlink data. Not the voting machines, the actual data tabulated in the e-polls. That is why only a hand count could prove if this happened or not.

Spoonermore is not a quack and he is not making this up. Yes, he could be wrong. But we should know, not just assume that he is wrong.

He has monitored election data for a long time and this is the first time he's raised a red flag.

We have all been conditioned to pretend it can't happen--but it can. Data can be compromised. We don't want to believe it, but it is possible.

And exactly how does knowing vs. not knowing cause harm? You'll need to explain that one to me.